S-01
Collision Analysis
Speed, sightline, and sequence analysis for passenger, commercial, and heavy-vehicle collisions — grounded in physical evidence, not assumption.
View discipline
We establish what happened and document why — building a clear, defensible record before your case reaches the courtroom.
Every engagement is built to meet the same admissibility bar your opposing counsel will test it against. Nothing enters the record that can't survive scrutiny.
Every lead analyst brings hands-on reconstruction and field-investigation experience to every file — not a technician working under a distant signature.
A consistent, documented methodology for collision and incident analysis, applied the same way on every matter so another expert can follow each step.
Peer-reviewed analytical methods, a documented chain of custody, and reports structured to withstand the scrutiny your case will face.
Three core disciplines, each carried by the same analyst from first call to final report — so the analysis you retain is the analysis you rely on.
Speed, sightline, and sequence analysis for passenger, commercial, and heavy-vehicle collisions — grounded in physical evidence, not assumption.
View disciplineRoot-cause investigation of structural, mechanical, and material failures — establishing how and why something broke, and who bore the duty to prevent it.
View disciplineDesign, manufacturing, and warning-defect analysis for products and equipment — expert opinions that connect the failure to the claim.
View disciplineA fixed, repeatable process from intake to trial support. Every phase is documented so opposing experts find method, not opinion.
Deadlines move quickly. Call us and we run a conflict check and scope review within one business day — so you know early whether the analysis supports your theory and what it will take to build it.
Start a caseRepresentative matters, anonymized for confidentiality. Each reflects a documented forensic conclusion that survived challenge.
Established impact speed and following distance from EDR data and roadway evidence; opposing speed theory withdrawn before trial.
Root-cause analysis identified an under-designed connection detail; isolating the failure mechanism from the surrounding damage.
Established a foreseeable-use failure mode and inadequate warning; opinions supported a favorable settlement.